An interesting study on puppy development:
Does Early Puppy Training Lead to Fewer Behavior Problems? | Psychology Today
An interesting study on puppy development:
An interesting study on puppy development:
Does Early Puppy Training Lead to Fewer Behavior Problems? | Psychology Today
Our shelter staff found a very experienced foster family to take in Penny and help her acclimate to living in a house. Two Fridays ago, they picked her up from the shelter and brought her to their home.
The following afternoon, I arrived at the shelter and found Penny back in her run, very happy to see me. It turns out that Penny had two additional issues that we had not known about: She was afraid of cars and she refused to use stairs. The first issue came up as the shelter staff helped her get into the foster family’s car. The second issue came up when they got to their home, which happens to be a second-floor walkup apartment. I should note that, for all her anxiety and self-harming tendencies, Penny is a remarkably gentle dog. When she objects to doing something, she simply freezes in place.
So. Two steps forward and one step back. Now we have to add cars and stairs to the list of things that Penny needs to become habituated to using. I tried the usual methods of getting her to use the shelter staircase, first by luring her with high value treats and later asking her to follow another friendly dog up them. I was able to get her to go up four steps and she finally put her hind feet on the bottom step, but that was as far as I could get; she would become overly anxious and shut down. And using this particular staircase became a non-starter when she caught on to the fact that the cats and small animals were housed near the stairs. There’s no way that treats were going to distract her from those.
So I decided to use a different approach to conquering her fear of stairs by getting her to use outdoor stairs in open areas. Unfortunately, large as our shelter grounds are, there are no stairs outside the building. We figured that a nearby middle school, which had wide outside steps, would be perfect for this effort; but that would mean getting her in a car. And we knew that Penny would have to become habituated to using multiple cars and generalize being in them. So, several of us began an effort to make cars fun and desirable by a combination of high value treats and pleasant experiences in them. We got her to follow us into cars and then took her on field trips to fun and interesting places, with lots of things to sniff. Within a few days, she was jumping into cars with minimal encouragement.
Then I started taking her to the middle school and using the stairs. On the first visit, a couple of days ago, she went up and down a low set of outside steps (four steps) but balked at using a larger one. We’re continuing to work on that.
We have more work to do with Penny, but she’s come along far enough that the shelter staff believe that she can be adopted out to a family that’s willing to work with her post-adoption. In the meantime, I’ll keep working with her on her few remaining issues.
First, do not rush. Get the dog to accept and trust you before attempting to modify her behavior. If, as far as she is concerned, you’re just a treat bag with an arm, you won’t get results that will transfer to an adoptive family and home.
Second, get the dog familiarized and comfortable in environment in which the behavior modification treatment is taking place. If she is stressed by being in a new location, you’re not going to get anywhere. Depending on the dog, this may take several visits.
Third, do not forget the basics. Penny’s treatment was complicated by the fact that the only skill in her repertoire was “sit”. This is a great help in leashing her up, but not good for much else. When you’re trying to get a dog to overcome a fear of performing a certain action, there is no substitute for having a good, solid recall.
Continued from Penny, a story of counterconditioning | The Animal Nerd
So, with progress made on her overly active greetings, which were affecting the number of shelter volunteers who were allowed to, or willing to, work with her; and with her anxiety at being outdoors reduced to the point that it was no longer apparent, it was time to start work on getting her to tolerate indoor spaces.
I continued taking her to explore outdoor areas and relaxing with her in shady shots where she could watch the comings and goings at the shelter. And I started experimenting with her behavior indoors. It soon became apparent that she: A. Refused to go through any doors except those that were in a direct path the outdoors; B. Refused to go through any interior corridors; and C. Wouldn’t walk on shiny floors. She didn’t panic when asked to go to any of these places. She simply froze in place and refused to move.
All of which would seriously get in the way of getting her adopted. On the plus side, she was very food motivated, and loves people and other dogs. So, this gave me something to work with.
In order to get her to tolerate shiny surfaces and being inside a building, I first had to get her to accept going through doors. I picked an entrance to the shelter that was in a fairly quiet spot and didn’t get a lot of foot traffic, but was near a section of occupied kennels (providing a scent-rich environment). After she had a nice walk and some down time, I walked her up to the entrance whereupon she balked and froze as soon as the door opened.
Fortunately, I was prepared. I kept her on leash, propped open the door, sat down and broke out my weapons: small pieces of sliced of hot dogs, string cheese and the stinkiest training treats that I could buy in my local warehouse store. I tossed an assortment of them on the ground immediately outside the door and, after some hesitation, she vacuumed them up and got praised. I repeated this several times, each time tossing the treats closer to the door threshold and praising her every time she stepped closer. Each time she advanced; I took up some of the slack in the leash without pulling her. This prevented her from retreating to square one, but also allowed her to establish a new comfort zone. It also precluded any oppositional pulling.
After several iterations during the following week, I was able to toss the treats inside the door while she stretched inside to get them; then, as I put the treats further inside, she began putting her front paws across the threshold. And she eventually stepped all the way inside. Once she was far enough in, I gently closed the door and kept praising her while giving her a good scratch. That was enough for the first day. She had earned a good cool down in her run.
On the next session, she balked at the door again, but overcame her fear more quickly and with fewer treats. By the third session, it took half as much time and reinforcement to get her inside. After that, I was able to get her to stay in the interior corridor without asking to leave, while getting scratches, pets and treats. I then enlisted some volunteers to join us in the corridor, and she relaxed enough to walk up to each of them and ask for pets. During the next session we moved further down the corridor and, she willingly entered the main lobby on the following day.
This was the big breakthrough. After getting her used to being in the lobby of the shelter, I was very quickly able to get her to visit all the public areas in the shelter, and she began to enjoy being around her human friends (e.g., everybody she met). She willingly used all the building entrances and the shelter lobby became her favorite place. She was getting very popular with the staff and volunteers, and had lots of positive interaction.
She was still occasionally snapping at the stump of her tail occasionally. Often when food was provided or she became excited. I began responding to this by giving her scratches on her butt and hips whenever she did this. She initially reacted to my doing this, but after a few repetitions, she began to accept this as a pleasant stimulus and relaxed and leaned into me while I was doing it. I enlisted other handlers and volunteers to do the same thing, and her self-harming reduced over the next several days as she accepted that activity along her flanks hindquarters was a good thing.
At this point, we had reduced her fear of being outside her run, had reduced her tendency to self-harm, she was greeting her handlers in a calm and friendly manner and her tendency to self-harm was greatly reduced. Our staff decided to place her in a foster home to continue her treatment and acclimate her to a home environment outside the shelter, and I felt that she was well on the way.
And that’s when the wheels came off the cart.
To be continued.
So, in late May I was at the shelter, and the Behavior Services manager asked me if I would like to have a “project dog”. That’s how I met Penny.
She is a 3-year-old, 50 lb mixed breed with a short brindle coat, natural ears and a docked tail. It turns out that her tail had been docked at the shelter because she was habitually attacking it whenever she had certain stimuli – such as every single meal – and had seriously injured it.
Aside from the compulsive self-harming whenever she was eating or overly excited, Penny showed signs of extreme anxiety. Her kennel was in a quiet area of the shelter that was closed off to visitors. Whenever she was taken outside, she would immediately head for the door to relieve herself and then continually try to lead her handler back inside to the safety of her kennel. She refused to use any door other than the one nearest to her kennel and she would refuse to use any part of the shelter interior beyond the minimum distance between her run and that door. On the plus side, she was friendly to every person on staff and gave exuberant greetings to her human friends – sometimes so exuberant that it was difficult to handle her – leading to her harness being kept on her at all times. In her current state, she was a sweet and friendly dog who was completely unadoptable.
She had been held by other shelters and fosters prior to arriving at ours. And the somewhat sketchy history that came along with her indicated that these were long-standing behavior problems – particularly her tendency to attack and injure her tail. At this point, she had been in the shelter for almost two months, between her initial quarantine, her surgery and recovery, there hadn’t been much work done on addressing her behavior problems. After getting the initial run-down of her (many) issues, I worked out a set of priorities with our behavior staff.
So…I got to work.
First things first: Getting her to at least tolerate being outdoors.
I took her out of her run as quietly and matter-of-factly as possible. I found that the usual method of quieting a jumping dog (negative reinforcement – removing the response to jumping, turning my back and standing still) worked very well. I then stayed to one side of her while attaching the leash to her martingale collar and easy-walk harness.
I then took her outside by her usual route. She was in a hurry to “do her business” and then wanted to return to her indoors kennel. By changing direction a few times, I was able to get her to walk at oblique angles to her initial route back to her safe place, and get her to spend some time outside. I noticed that when she was actively sniffing a new scent, she relaxed. Her ears went back, her tail went up, her back relaxed, and she forgot to be afraid. I could work with that. I found a bench in a shady spot and sat with her for a while, not interacting with her unless she solicited any touching or petting, and just let her experience the day. She never really relaxed on that first day, but she didn’t try to escape or go back inside until I brought her back indoors.
For the next two weeks, I took her outside and made a point of walking her on the shelter grounds in areas that other dogs frequented and along the tree lines where rabbits and other local wildlife were common. Basically, anywhere that was a scent-rich environment. This was a positive experience for her; and within those two-weeks she completely lost her anxiety about being outdoors and enjoyed experiencing the entire area that our shelter encompasses, several acres of open land.
I then took her to our outdoor exercise area, which is a large open grassy area inside a six-foot fence. The first time I unclipped her leash inside it, she immediately ran to the gate and started leaping at it, trying to escape. I leashed her back up and walked her around the inside perimeter of the exercise pen, letting her stop and sniff whenever she wanted, before taking her back outside for some quiet time. After that, I made a point of taking her to the exercise area immediately after some other dogs had been there, creating a scent-rich environment. Over the next week, she became interested in investigating the scents and was able to enjoy being there and relaxing off-leash.
Step One done. After three weeks, she was no longer anxious about being outdoors, and was associating outdoor time with interesting nose work and relaxation. And we had made progress made on Step Four. This was going so easily, I was feeling pretty optimistic.
To be continued.
As if it wasn’t bad enough that an unknown illness is spreading in our wild songbird populations.
Snakes look like monsters as fungal disease spreads in US, experts say (phys.org)
August 22 Update: Cornell University is still advising that, although the cause of the illness is still undetermined, cases are declining. Wildlife authorities in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia, Kentucky and West Virginia, as well as the Audubon Societies in Maryland and Rhode Island, have lifted their advisories regarding bird feeders and bird baths (Nimmo, 2021; Audubon Society of Rhode Island, 2021; Wildlife Center of Virginia, 2021; WeinGartner, 2021). We are requested to continue regular cleaning of baths and feeders, using a 10 percent bleach solution.
July 31 Update: The illness is being reported in some Illinois counties where it had previously not been detected (Smith, 2021). Reports of infected birds are continuing to decline in Pennsylvania, along with Virginia and Kentucky (KDKA, 2021).
However, the Audubon Society is advising that the cause of the illness is still unknown. This is a particularly sensitive time, as many of our bird species will be departing on their annual migrations to Central and South America, and there is great concern that – if this disease is contagious – that it might be spread to native bird populations there. We will probably be requested to refrain from using our bird feeders and bird baths through the month of August (Gerrity, 2021).
July 30 Update: News sources in Virginia and Kentucky are reporting sharp declines in reported cases of the illness that’s been affecting the mid-Atlantic and midwest states (INSIDENOVA, 2021; Times-Tribune, 2021). As yet, the illness has not been reported in New England or west of Illinois.
Although this is encouraging news, the cause of this die-off of wild songbirds still has not been identified and it is still to be determined whether infected birds are contagious. So wildlife authorities throughout the affected states, and the surrounding states – including New England – are asking that we continue to take down our feeders and bird baths.
July 29 Update: Cornell University’s Lab of Ornithology and the College of Veterinary Medicine is reporting that cases of the songbird illness are declining and the mortality rates are decreasing; and that bird populations are stable.
July 28 Update:
The songbird illness continues to take toll on our wild bird population, and is now reported in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. It has not been reported in New England, or states west of Illinois, although residents of the surrounding states are being advised to take down their feeders and bird baths as a means of limiting birds congregating and reducing the spread of the disease.
The cause is still unknown, however scientists have eliminated known bird viruses and the bacterium that have caused previous similar outbreaks. The recent cicada brood hatching also appears to be unrelated to this disease, as it is being found in areas where the cicadas didn’t appear. At this point, twelve bird species have been found to be affected: the blue jay, European sterling, grackle, American robin, northern cardinal, house finch, house sparrow, eastern bluebird, willow tit, Carolina chickadee, and mayow tit (Patterson, 2021).
There is some speculation that the illness may be caused by toxins associated with invasive insect species, perhaps in concert with invasive plant species (Abbott, 2021). However this seems unlikely to be the case, as the illness would probably have been known to exist in the overseas locations where these species are native. However, the idea that a toxin is somehow involved would seem to explain why the disease mostly affects young birds, which would have been fed high concentrations of local seeds or insects.
July 11, 2021:
In the past few weeks, a new deadly disease has emerged on the Eastern Seaboard of the United States, affecting a wide variety of songbirds. Scientists are still trying to determine the nature of the illness and how it is transmitted, and whether it is a new virus or a fungal infection, but it is causing thousands of deaths across a wide range of unrelated bird species, including robins, blue jays, cardinals, woodpeckers, and others (Malakoff & Stokeland, 2021).
The symptoms include crusted and inflamed eyes and the neurological symptoms include inability to stand and head tremors. The birds are unable to fly or feed themselves and eventually die.
The disease was first noted in the Washington DC area in May of this year (USGS, 2021), but rapidly spread to the adjacent states. It is now appearing in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana and is continuing to spread. Although the nature of the illness is still unknown, based on its rapid spread throughout the eastern and midwestern states, it appears to be highly contagious across a wide range of bird species (Zenkevitch, 2021; ).
We can help to limit the spread of the disease by reducing the number of places where songbirds congregate and are likely to infect each other. State authorities, even in areas such as the New England states in which the disease has not yet been found, are asking that we take down our bird feeders and bird baths until the disease has subsided, and that they be thoroughly cleaning with a 10 percent bleach solution before being put back in use (RI DEM, 2021; AP, 2021).
This isn’t a lot to ask. If we’re feeding the birds because we want them to be well fed and we enjoy having them in our lives then, until this disease runs its course, it makes sense for us to encourage them to look for natural sources of food and not congregate in large numbers at a common feeding site. Our wild bird populations are already under stress from climate change and loss of habitat. There is no reason for us to add to that by facilitating the spread of a disease. Lets take down our feeders and bird baths, clean them thoroughly, and wait until we hear that its safe to put the up again.
Abbott, B. (July 27, 2021). Opinion: Seeking to Solve Mystery Songbird Illness. CTPost. Retrieved from https://www.ctpost.com/opinion/article/Opinion-Seeking-to-solve-mystery-songbird-illness-16342822.php
Associated Press (July 8, 2021). Residents Told to Stop Filling Feeders to Avert Bird Illness. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/ct-state-wire-birds-health-environment-and-nature-412ec4d6d2ec8c1c23f772a577795394
Audubon Society of Rhode Island (August 20, 2021) Bird Feeding Can Resume in Rhode Island. Retrieved from https://asri.org/news-events/2021/audubon-monitoring-bird-illness-in-mid-atlantic.html
Fisher, F. (July 27, 2021). Cornell experts not overly alarmed by mysterious songbird sickness. Retrieved from https://www.ithaca.com/news/ithaca/cornell-experts-not-overly-alarmed-by-mysterious-songbird-sickness/article_ae73fa12-efc6-11eb-9a3f-ef82b40e923f.html
Gerrity, K. (July 30, 2021) An Update From The Connecticut Audubon Society About Bird Disease. Patch. Retrieved from https://patch.com/connecticut/essex-chester-deepriver/update-connecticut-audubon-society-bird-disease/
INSIDENOVA (July 29, 2021). Mystery songbird illnesses, deaths improving in Northern Virginia. Retrieved from Mystery songbird illnesses, deaths improving in Northern Virginia | Headlines | insidenova.com
KDKA (July 31, 2021). Reports Of Illnesses In Songbirds Declining After Mysterious Disease Caused Dozens Of Deaths. Retrieved from https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2021/07/31/reports-of-illnesses-in-songbirds-declining-after-mysterious-disease-caused-dozens-of-deaths/
Malakoff, D. and Stokeland, E. (Jul 6, 2021). Songbirds are Mysteriously Dying Across the Eastern U.S. Scientists are Scrambling to Find Out Why. Science Magazine. Retrieved from Songbirds are mysteriously dying across the eastern U.S. Scientists are scrambling to find out why | Science | AAAS (sciencemag.org)
Nimmo, T. (August 20, 2021). Kentuckians can put bird feeders back outside after mystery illness. WCPO. Retrieved from https://www.wcpo.com/news/state/state-kentucky/kentuckians-can-put-bird-feeders-back-outside-after-mystery-illness
Patterson, R. (nd). Don’t Feed the Birds! PA. The Mysterious Death of a Songbird in Japan Sparks and Investigation. Pennsylvania News Today. Retrieved from https://pennsylvanianewstoday.com/dont-feed-the-birds-pa-the-mysterious-death-of-a-songbird-in-japan-sparks-an-investigation-life/183199/
Rhode Island DEM, Division of Fish and Wildlife (July 8, 2021). Wildlife Health Alert. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/RIFishwildlife/
Smith, K. (July, 30, 2021). First cases of mystery songbird illness seen in suburban wildlife centers. Daily Herald. Retrieved from https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20210730/first-cases-of-mystery-songbird-illness-seen-in-suburban-wildlife-centers/
Times-Tribune (July 29, 2021). Kentucky Fish and Wildlife provides update about bird illness investigation. Retrieved from Kentucky Fish and Wildlife provides update about bird illness investigation | Local News | thetimestribune.com
USGS (July 2, 2021). UPDATED Interagency Statement: USGS and Partners Continue Investigating DC Area Bird Mortality Event. Retrieved from UPDATED Interagency Statement: USGS and Partners Continue Investigating DC Area Bird Mortality Event
Weingartner, T. (August 20, 2021). As ‘Mystery’ Bird Illness Continues, Some in Tri-State May Put Bird Feeders Back Out With Precautions. WVXU. Retrieved from https://www.wvxu.org/environment/2021-08-20/mystery-bird-illness-bird-feeders
Wildlife Center of Virginia (August 20, 2021). Update of 2021 Avian Unusual Mortality Event. Retrieved from https://www.wildlifecenter.org/news_events/news/update-2021-avian-unusual-mortality-event
Zenkevich, J. (July 7, 2021). M ore Than 1,000 cases of Mysterious Bird Disease Reported in Pennsylvania. WESA. Retrieved from More than 1,000 Cases of Mysterious Bird Disease Reported In Pennsylvania | 90.5 WESA
This article is the latest in my discussion of alternative medicine approaches that have become commonplace in the care and treatment of our companion animals. Today, we will discuss the art of Reiki.
According to its practitioners
“Reiki is a Japanese technique for stress reduction and relaxation that also promotes healing. It is administered by “laying on hands” and is based on the idea that an unseen “life force energy” flows through us and is what causes us to be alive. If one’s “life force energy” is low, then we are more likely to get sick or feel stress, and if it is high, we are more capable of being happy and healthy.” (What is Reiki, nd)
The origin of Reiki dates back to the early 20th century Japan and is credited to Mikao Usei. Usei is said to have investigated ancient, lost healing arts and rediscovered the art of directing Universal Life-Force Energy (Rowland, 2010) for the purpose of healing illness and injury. The research he is supposed to have performed in recovering this healing art is not documented and a plethora of legends have sprung up about it. Some accounts invented by later Reiki practitioners say that he journeyed to India to study with healing mystics there and others imply that he learned the methods by which the Buddha performed healing miracles (Monckton, nd). He is said to have trained a few disciples in this healing art who, in turn, trained others. Over the years, this practice has become both refined and varied in its application.
There are three levels of Reiki “mastery”, each of which can be learned from a course of instruction. There is no oversight or professional certification for Reiki; students are certified by whichever organization they enroll in for courses of training (Nelson, nd; Crowhurst, nd.) Many of these courses are available online for home study. Reiki practitioners are said to be “attuned” by the Reiki master who trains them, either in person or by correspondence (Adams, 2016)
There really is no standard of treatment for Reiki practitioners.
There are standard locations for this touching to take place (the seven chakras of the human body), however the practitioner is also able to place his hands anywhere that he feels the flow of energy is required (Cutler, 2011)
Given that Reiki is administered either by touch, without touching, across a room or across great distances, there is no standard of treatment. Nor are there any specific standards for addressing particular injuries or ailments; this is all left to the subjective judgement of the Reiki practitioner.
And there is no standard of training. Every Reiki instructor certifies his or her own students in whatever methods are included in that course of training. There is no measurement of effectiveness except for the subjects’ feelings of whether they have been helped by the treatment.
It is used to treat animals for a variety of conditions, by the same touch, non-touch, distance methods discussed above. Some Reiki practitioners have identified the locations of animals’ chakras, which would server to determine where the healing energy should be directed.
There are very few quality studies of Reiki. Most have been found to be seriously flawed by lack of control groups, subjective interpretation of data and other flaw. A 2008 review of clinical trials of Reiki treatment for a variety of conditions concluded:
“In total, the trial data for any one condition are scarce and independent replications are not available for each condition. Most trials suffered from methodological flaws such as small sample size, inadequate study design and poor reporting…In conclusion, the evidence is insufficient to suggest that reiki is an effective treatment for any condition. Therefore the value of reiki remains unproven.” (Lee, Pittler & Ernst, 2008)
One 2017 review of studies, performed by a member of the Australian Usei Reiki Association, claimed that the majority of clinical trials indicate that Reiki is ‘a safe and gentle “complementary” therapy that activates the parasympathetic nervous system to heal body and mind.’ (McManus, 2017). However, it should be noted that the author of this review has no medical qualifications, and that the parasympathetic nervous system controls resting heart rate and digestion and performs no healing functions.
A 2011 study examined the use of Reiki in which a group of people undergoing chemotherapy underwent treatment by certified practitioners, while another group were treated by untrained persons performing “sham Reiki”, with a third (control) group of patients undergoing standard care. This study found that the persons treated by both the certified and “sham” (placebo) groups reported the same results in terms of well-being and comfort in comparison with the control group. The study concluded that there is no medical benefit derived from Reiki, but that patients derive a sense of well-being from one-on-one care from a nurse practitioner, regardless of the care being provided (Catlin & Taylor-Ford, 2011). I was also able to find a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study found that Reiki had no effect over placebo on subject’s heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature and stress (Bat, 2021).
So, based on the evidence, we can only conclude that Reiki is a placebo. And, despite its popularity and the mythology surrounding it, there is no indication that it has any medical or therapeutic value. As the Catlin and Taylor-Ford study indicated, the value of Reiki is simply the one-on-one presence of a supportive person.
The simple answer is that it doesn’t. The placebo effect is felt by the animals’ owners. The owners are primed by the Reiki practitioner to see signs of improvement in their animals and, being inclined to believe in this treatment, fall victim to confirmation bias. This is particularly the case with dogs. Dogs are very attuned to our moods and are adept at reading our body language and facial expressions, and they look to us for social cues. If a dog sees that his owner is encouraged or relieved that a treatment is perceived to be working, then that dog will respond to the owner’s change in mood – further reinforcing the owner’s belief that Reiki has worked wonders.
I am sure that many Reiki practitioners are sincere and honestly believe in their work. But the simple fact is that there is no medical value in this “therapy”. And, if it is used in place of proven, science-based veterinary medicine, then it is harmful and amounts to withholding care from suffering animals.
Adams, T. (January 4, 2016). Reiki for Animals. Retrieved from Reiki for Animals | Intuitive Understanding
Bat, N. (2021). The Effects of Reiki on Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, Body Temperature, and Stress Levels: a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Placebo-Controlled Study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 43 (5). doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101328
Catlin, A. and Taylor-Ford, R. L. (2011). Investigation of Standard Care Versus Reiki Placebo Versus Actual Reiki Therapy to Enhance Comfort and Well-Being in a Chemotherapy Infusion Center. Oncology Nursing Forum 38 (3). doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.E212-E220
Crowhurst, M. (nd). Reiki Level I, II and Master Certification – Energy Healing. Retrieved from Reiki Certificate: Master Certification in Energy Healing | Udemy
Cutler, N. (2011). Reiki Hand Positions. Institute for Integrative Healthcare. Retrieved from Reiki Hand Positions | Massage Professionals Update (integrativehealthcare.org)
Johnson, K. (2015). The Awesomeness of Distance Reiki. Retrieved from https://universoulheart.net/soul-journeys-2/the-awesomeness-of-distance-reiki.html
Lee, M. S., Pittler, M. H. and Ernst, E. (2008). Effects of Reiki in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. The International Journal of Clinical Practice 62 (6). P 947-954. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01729.x
McManus, D. E. (2017). Reiki is Better Than Placebo and Has Broad Potential as a Complementary Health Therapy. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine 22 (4). 1051 – 1057. doi: 10.1177/2156587217728644
Monckton, G. (nd). The History of Reiki. Retrieved from The History of Reiki (georgianamoncktonreiki.com)
Nelson, D. (nd). Reiki Infinite Healer. Retrieved from Reiki Infinite Healer Course | Chakras, Symbols + Certification
Paul, N. (nd). Using Reiki for the Family Pet. Retrieved from Using Reiki for the Family Pet – dummies
Rowland, A. Z. (2010). The Complete Book of Traditional Reiki, Practical Methods for Personal and Planetary Healing. Kindle Edition, Retrieved from Amazon.com
What is Reiki? (nd), The International Center for Reiki Training. Retrieved from What is Reiki? | Reiki
We are living in an era when the climate is getting warmer and creating severe weather conditions. The Atlantic hurricane season is starting earlier and the storms are getting stronger. Out west, we have unprecedented heat and drought; the western states are drying out and are at increasing risk of large fires. Cities are experiencing heat emergencies during months when temperatures used to be moderate. Disaster Planning is becoming a necessity for animal owners.
Every one of us could be required to evacuate their homes at short notice, due to some disaster or weather emergency. The question becomes, what do to with our pets? Most of us would simply assume that our pets can go with us. This is true, but only if we plan in advance. A lack of planning and preparedness could be disastrous, as we have seen in past natural disasters when people were forced to abandon their homes and animals.
I’m not saying that you should be in a constant state of readiness to flee your home, however if a hurricane is being forecasted in the next several days, or if the area in which you live is at high risk for fire, you should have a plan and some preparations made to leave for a safer place to ride out the emergency. This should include knowing which vehicles to use, making sure their maintained and fueled, having a ready bag that includes medications, some food and clothing, important papers, prescriptions, medical records, identification, contact numbers, mobile phones and chargers, etc. You should also have a route planned and be informed of your county’s and state’s disaster planning.
But what to do regarding your pets? What items should you have ready, or pre-packed for the event of evacuation? The following is compiled from materials provided by the Department of Homeland Security, the Red Cross, the ASPCA and the Humane Society (links provided below).
Before going further, bear in mind that these are things you have to plan for prior to the emergency. You need to do your research now, make your plans now; and make sure you have the documentation and supplies on hand before the emergency is upon you.
If you think that you’ll have to evacuate, do not wait until the last minute. You want to be one of the first people out of a dangerous area, not one of the last ones to leave.
Have an evacuation plan. Have a safe destination picked out and know whether it can accommodate both you and your animals. Or have an alternative safe place identified that can take care of your pets during the evacuation.
If you plan to stay in a hotel, identify several in the area that you plan to stay in that accept pets. The Humane Society link at the end of this article lists several resources for finding them.
If you are going to stay with a friend or relative, make arrangements with them in advance.
Keep in mind that most Red Cross shelters, and many state shelters, cannot accept pets. If you are going to one of these shelters, have a list of places that accept the pets of evacuated families, along with contact information and directions.
In the event that you have to be separated from your pets during an evacuation, find shelters, boarding kennels or veterinarians in the area that you plan to be staying that can take your pet temporarily. Your local emergency management office is a good source of this information.
Have a portable crate or carrier for your pets, along with a leash and reliable collar for use during travel. Keep in mind that you and your pets will both be stressed and anxious, and there is a risk that they’ll panic and try to escape.
Have your pets’ medications (in a waterproof container), and copies of their medical records, vaccination record and prescriptions.
Have a pre-written set of instructions and schedule for feeding your pet(s) and for administering any medications. You might be separated from them at some point and have them cared for at a different location than yours.
Have a sealed, airtight container with enough of their food to last while you anticipate being out of your home. Bring you pets’ food and water bowls.
Have your pets’ identification information, including microchip number and city registration, and a picture of you and your pet together (in case you are separated for any reason).
Have enough drinking water for you and your pet to last for a few days.
Comfort items: Bring the bedding and toys that you would normally provide if you were boarding your pet in a kennel for a few days. Bring poop bags and cleaning supplies/disinfectants. Bring your cat’s litter box and a bag of clean litter.
Prepare a safe, closed, room where rescuers can find your animals. Make sure that it doesn’t have any escape routes or places where the animals can hide or get stuck.
Have you pet’s crate in that room, stock that room with the food and supplies mentioned above, along with any medications.
Prepare the safe room as described above and leave the pet in it with accessible dry food and a lot of water. It will be a mess when you return, but that can be cleaned up afterwards.
Do not leave them outside, even in a run or pen. And absolutely do not turn them loose to fend for themselves.
The ASPCA recommends placing a notice on your door to alert police and rescuers that pets are inside.
A final note: These recommendations were obviously written with common household pets in mind. Large animals, such as horses, or exotic pets will require special care and planning for disasters that are outside my area of expertise. The ASPCA disaster preparedness site (below) has recommendations and resources for the owners of these animals.
In a dog’s world, fireworks and thunderstorms are very similar. Both involve sudden flashes of light, loud and low-level noises, new scents (ozone from a thunderstorm and gunpowder from fireworks). Dogs can become very fearful of these experiences, sometimes to the point of developing extreme fear responses or phobias. Much of this varies according to the dog’s experiences with sudden noises, its early exposure to these stimuli and the dog’s general personality (Blackwell, Bradshaw & Casey, 2013). In these cases, many owners have attempted to relieve their dogs’ fear by means of a pressure wrap, sometimes marketed under Thundershirt®.
Anxiety wraps have been used to treat behavioral issues in autism patients and to aid in reducing fear and stress. Deep pressure, such as firm hugs and muscle massage has been shown to release endorphins that can relieve pain and provide a sense of well-being in the short term (McKenzie, 2011). However, the question remains whether a light sense of pressure, such as provided by an anxiety-wrap, can provide the deep endorphin-releasing stimulus that a massage provides; and, if so, whether wearing a wrap for the duration of a fireworks display or thunderstorm is effective.
So, do they work? Possibly. But there’s very little evidence to support the claims made by manufacturers and marketers of these products.
First off, much of the evidence presented to support the claims of effectiveness are in the form of testimonials or product endorsements. This sort of claim should always be taken with a pinch of salt, as they are often simply invented by sales staffs.
The majority of the other claims of effectiveness are anecdotal reports by laypersons, based on their observations of their own pets. This sort of reporting is generally unreliable, simply because of the strong possibility of unintentional confirmation bias on the part of the dog owner. That, and the possibility of a sort of placebo effect on the owners’ part, in which they see improvement that may not actually be present.
With regard to clinical evidence, there is very little. The one quality study that I could find shows that pressure wraps do nothing to affect the physical symptoms of fear and anxiety (measured heart rate) but did result in some changes in the dogs’ anxiety-related behaviors. Which indicates that the dogs’ fear wasn’t reduced, but their behavior in expressing that fear was affected (King, Buffington, Smith & Grandin, 2014). This begs the question as to whether the pressure wrap is actually helping the dog. The dog may appear calmer, but is simply staying still because he feels inhibited in his movements (Buzhardt, nd). A review of related studies published in 2018 indicated that most studies were based on owners’ subjective assessments of their dogs’ emotional states and concluded that the vests may have small positive effects but that owners should have no expectation or any benefits from using them (Buckley, 2018).
As a behavior consultant, I am skeptical of the anecdotal claims made regarding these products. As stated above, a fair number of them are dubious in nature (this is the internet, after all) and may simply be cases of “astroturfing”. And, as discussed above, claims made by individual dog owners can’t be considered reliable, no matter how well-intentioned. They are not disinterested parties and are not making controlled studies. Also, the vast majority of owners do not have the training to accurately diagnose dogs’ behaviors, and do not have the facilities to measure heartrate, blood pressure and cortisol levels associated with severe anxiety.
I am also somewhat concerned about the use of these products without the involvement of behavior professionals: Incorrectly used, a dog may come to associate the vest with unpleasant stimuli that it is intended to alleviate, making the fear response worse. Also, if worn for extended periods, the dog may become habituated to the vest, making it ineffective. And, if a dog is overwhelmed by the noise, sight and smells going on around him, adding the stimulus of touch may be the worst thing that an owner can do.
Mainly, I am reluctant to recommend these products simply because they do nothing to reduce the dog’s fears. They do not address the underlying causes of the extreme anxiety and stress that the dog is experiencing.
The way to alleviate dogs’ (and peoples’) fear of objects or situations is to change their emotional state through desensitization and counterconditioning. These involve treating the dog’s sensitivity to the event that is causing the fear reaction, by gradually increasing the dog’s tolerance to it and/or by introducing a positive experience that the dog can come to associate with the anxiety-causing event (Todd, 2018). The goal is to help the dog by reducing the amount of fear and anxiety that he experiences in response to certain stimuli, in this case thunder or fireworks. The goal of a behaviorist is to help a patient be less afraid, instead of outwardly seeming less fearful.
In some cases, veterinary assistance may be needed. At the risk of introducing an anecdote, I have been involved in a case in which a dog was left alone in a house during a particularly violent thunderstorm and developed an extreme fear to them. This was treated by a veterinary behaviorist, who prescribed a low dose of valium to be taken when thunderstorms were imminent. After a few treatments, the dog “learned” that she was not fearful during the thunderstorms and her reactions to the storms were greatly lessened.
What’s the takeaway?
As stated by King et al, “This pressure wrap can be used adjunctively in a treatment program for dogs with these specific anxiety diagnoses, but should not replace current treatment options (behavior modification and medication) for canine Separation Anxiety and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Caution must be practiced if using the ThunderShirt for dogs with phobic reactions to loud noises or thunderstorms, as this had not been studied with the canine anxiety diagnoses.”
I suggest that they may be used as part of a treatment program that employs science-based behavior assessment and modification techniques to reduce the fear that dogs associate with thunderstorms or fireworks; but should not be relied upon by pet owners as a stand-alone treatment that is administered at home.
Blackwell, E. J., Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Casey, R A. (2013). Fear Responses to Noises in Domestic Dogs: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Co-Occurance with Other Fear Related Behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 145 (1-2). 15 – 25. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.12.004
Buckley, L. A. (2018). Are Pressure Vests Beneficial at Reducing Stress in Anxious and Fearful Dogs? Veterinary Evidence, 3 (1). doi: 10.18849/VE.V311.152
Buzhardt, L. (nd). Anxiety Vests for Dogs. Retrieved from Anxiety Vests for Dogs | VCA Animal Hospital (vcahospitals.com)
King, C., Buffington, L., Smith, T. J. and Grandin, T. (2014). The Effect of a Pressure Wrap (Thundershirt®) on Heart Rate and Behavior in Canines Diagnosed with Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9 (5). 215-221. Doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.06.007
McKenzie, B. (2011) Pressure Wraps for Anxiety in Dogs. Retrieved from Pressure Wraps for Anxiety in Dogs | (skeptvet.com)
Todd, Z. (2018). What is Desensitization and Counter-Conditioning in Dog Training? Retrieved from What is Desensitization and Counter-Conditioning in Dog Training? (companionanimalpsychology.com)
One thing that I have learned from years of working with insecure, reactive and fearful shelter dogs is the value of just being quiet. Just relaxing with your dog is one of the best things you can do for your dog’s emotional stability and well-being. And it’s not bad for you, either.
You don’t need to be a constant source of entertainment for your dog, and you don’t need to provide constant stimulation. In fact, it immensely helps your dog for you both to be in a mildly stimulating environment, like a park or green space, and just relax.
Anytime you take your dog for a walk, your pup is constantly receiving new stimuli. His nose, ears and eyes are taking in new information all the time you are out of the house, and his brain is actively processing all that data. You don’t need to do anything else, except be a steady and positive companion. I’ve found that being a quiet and calm influence in information-rich environments can help a nervous or reactive dog to find his “off-switch” and learn that he can live in the world without becoming anxious or over-excited.
When weather permits, take your dog on a walk to a quiet, pleasant place and just sit. Read a book – a real book with pages. Don’t look at your phone, get any work done, watch any videos or read anything that has a string of nasty and stupid comments at the end. Just relax and find your own off-switch. Let your dog sniff and explore within the range of his leash and do whatever he’s going to do.
After a while, you’ll find that he is just scenting the air, listening to new sounds and watching things that are interesting to him. If he’s being at all reactive to any of that, take him to a new spot and start over. It may take some time, but you’ll find that he will eventually sit or lay down and relax with you. Watch the shape of his eyes and the corners of his mouth, along with the position of his ears. You’ll be able to tell when he’s just quietly enjoying the day. With you.
This will do wonders for your relationship with your dog, and will help him to learn how to be less reactive to stimulus. If he sees that you are not stressed or bothered by the people, animals and things you encounter, he will take that as a reference for his own behavior. This is good therapy for you both.